For the moment lets think about the destructive kind. If we continue to engage in a situation where we feel that Scripture is being consistently and deliberately violated for the sake of unity, I wonder if we are not contributing to the problem. By our continual engagement we are saying by our presence that we do not feel that the issue is a problem. Regardless of what we say, what we do speaks louder. If we are continuing to engage where the Word is not honored, or sections of it are dismissed as irrelevant, our credibility when we teach that it should be honored and that it is relevant lacks integrity.
The most difficult challenge in this is choosing which battles to fight.